Great Tew: Wall Paintings and a Priest's Apology

I took these photographs of the wall paintings at St Michael and All Angels, Great Tew. They belong, I understand, to one of the most important surviving groups of early 14th‑century wall paintings in Oxfordshire. They form part of a larger narrative cycle running along the south aisle wall, and the image shown here is one of the panels that fits neatly between the aisle windows. It depicts scenes from the Passion cycle.

At the right-hand end of what is effectively the lowest tier is the Appearance to Mary Magdalene — one of the clearest surviving images. Two small trees frame the scene, and Mary, on the right, kneels reverently before Christ, who holds the banner of the Resurrection.

Noli Me Tangere - Appearance to Mary Magdalene

There is a certain irony in the fact that the central image of the Resurrection has been largely lost beneath a later memorial tablet. When such monuments were installed, the existence of medieval wall paintings — often whitewashed after the Reformation or simply forgotten — was probably not suspected. And so this central and crucial image is now reduced to Christ’s foot stepping out of the tomb and a handful of tiny soldiers, one of whom, on the right, is seen leaning on his shield.

The Resurrection 

The memorial is to the Reverend Charles Dayman, M.A., who served as the Vicar of Great Tew from 1830 until his death in August 1844. His tenure spanned a transformative and highly turbulent era for both the local parish and the wider Church of England.

Before arriving in Oxfordshire, Dayman was educated at Exeter College, Oxford. He initially found clerical work as a curate at St. James’s Church in Dover, Kent, where he lived with his wife. 

He was formally instituted as the Perpetual Vicar of St Michael and all Angels in 1830. Dayman ran the parish at a time when religious nonconformity was surging in rural Oxfordshire. By 1834, just a few years into his tenure, Great Tew was reporting a massive spike in residents identifying as Baptists or "Ranters" (Primitive Methodists). 

Dayman spent much of his energy trying to retain his congregation against the draw of local cottage meetings. He took an active role in running the local school and his strict, structured educational regime was highly regarded by the regional gentry, who sent their children to Great Tew specifically to be tutored under his leadership.

Dayman’s family was profoundly impacted by the Oxford Movement.

I thought I might imagine how the Rev. Dayman might look on his own memorial today:

An Apology from the South Aisle 

Forgive me, Lord, for where my marble lies,
Blotting the ancient pigments of Your grace.
My passing breath they sought to solemnise.
With heavy hand, and blind to any trace,
The parish carved my name in polished stone,
Right where the medieval masters drew
The rising Christ, who broke the tomb alone,
To bring the dying world a life anew.
Yet here I stand, imposter before the grave,
My cold memorial blocking out the light,
A mortal man entombing Him who saves,
And hiding resurrection from our sight.
Dear Saviour, scratch away my proud decree;
Let Dayman fade, that we might look on Thee.

These survivals remind us how precarious medieval art can be. Parish churches were living buildings, altered and adapted to the needs of each generation. What remains is accidental and all the more precious for it. At Great Tew, the faint red lines still carry the energy of the original hand, working I imagine, from familiar models and with a sure sense of narrative and gesture.

For those who want to explore the cycle in more detail, an excellent and comprehensive review is available here , with fine, clear images of each section